p***@gmail.com
2016-07-02 21:06:29 UTC
First off. They only males that I know that support not being circumsized are those who aren't.
The health agreement doesn't hold water. I know two men from Europe that as adult men had to be circumsized due to infections.
Every girl that I know, my son is gay, he says 95% of men prefer circumsized penises for a few very good reasons. 1. The uncut have to be vigilant in keeping the penis head very clean other wise it will produce a nasty yellow substance. Men, after they take a leak, after the shaking and squeezing to make sure all the urine is out know that as soon as you tuck yourself back in a drop of urine will come out. Now imagine you are uncut, that drop as well as every drop after urinating is trapped under and inside the foreskin. NASTY!!! 2. Uncircumcised penis look like a the nose of an ant eater or dog dick, it comes to a point. 3. As Elaine from the show Seinfeld once said after asked if she prefers cut or uncut. She like most gay men and straight women prefer circumcised otherwise it looks like it's missing a face.
As far as being brutal. Let me tell you I'm lucky and gratiful my parents choose for me to be cut. Sure it's painful, so is falling and scraping your knees, you get over it. The baby is usually finished crying in 5 to 10 minutes.
My two European men who were cut as adults tell me that the sex feeling is the exact same. So the argument that an uncut penis has more of a pleasurable feeling is at least in the case with these two is no different.
If circumsizion is barbaric, then we best not immunize baby using needles. Stick a needle in your arm is similar to being circumsized
I also read that the Amish like to stay away from modernization so they are not circumsized. Circumcision is not modern, it's as old as both the Jewish and islamic faiths
Jews, Australian, muslims, and Americans tend to practice circumcision.
Now having three Amish family friends in Lancaster and Ronks I can tell you how they responded when I asked them the question. It's up to the family and most (89%) choose their boys to be circumcised. Not for religious reasons, rather health reasons.
Lastly the men who try to promote the idea of abolishing or not having boys circumsized are not circumsized. It's their way of saying "Geeze, I wish my parents had me cut as a baby because they know it's ugly, non-desirable, unhealthy, and can stink. My son even told me some uncut men have a hard time having sex because the skin can not always be pulled back for masturbation, it can be painful. As a matter of fact King Louis of France did not have sex until after 7 years of marriage. Marie Antoinnette writes a letter to her mother over seven years since the marriage that they finally consummated the marriage. The reason why....he was one of those guys who was not cut and when getting an erection it cause great pain
One can argue my point all day, their argument of health or better sex simply doesn't hold water.
Who is upset with my story of circumcision, those guys who have dog dicks
The health agreement doesn't hold water. I know two men from Europe that as adult men had to be circumsized due to infections.
Every girl that I know, my son is gay, he says 95% of men prefer circumsized penises for a few very good reasons. 1. The uncut have to be vigilant in keeping the penis head very clean other wise it will produce a nasty yellow substance. Men, after they take a leak, after the shaking and squeezing to make sure all the urine is out know that as soon as you tuck yourself back in a drop of urine will come out. Now imagine you are uncut, that drop as well as every drop after urinating is trapped under and inside the foreskin. NASTY!!! 2. Uncircumcised penis look like a the nose of an ant eater or dog dick, it comes to a point. 3. As Elaine from the show Seinfeld once said after asked if she prefers cut or uncut. She like most gay men and straight women prefer circumcised otherwise it looks like it's missing a face.
As far as being brutal. Let me tell you I'm lucky and gratiful my parents choose for me to be cut. Sure it's painful, so is falling and scraping your knees, you get over it. The baby is usually finished crying in 5 to 10 minutes.
My two European men who were cut as adults tell me that the sex feeling is the exact same. So the argument that an uncut penis has more of a pleasurable feeling is at least in the case with these two is no different.
If circumsizion is barbaric, then we best not immunize baby using needles. Stick a needle in your arm is similar to being circumsized
I also read that the Amish like to stay away from modernization so they are not circumsized. Circumcision is not modern, it's as old as both the Jewish and islamic faiths
Jews, Australian, muslims, and Americans tend to practice circumcision.
Now having three Amish family friends in Lancaster and Ronks I can tell you how they responded when I asked them the question. It's up to the family and most (89%) choose their boys to be circumcised. Not for religious reasons, rather health reasons.
Lastly the men who try to promote the idea of abolishing or not having boys circumsized are not circumsized. It's their way of saying "Geeze, I wish my parents had me cut as a baby because they know it's ugly, non-desirable, unhealthy, and can stink. My son even told me some uncut men have a hard time having sex because the skin can not always be pulled back for masturbation, it can be painful. As a matter of fact King Louis of France did not have sex until after 7 years of marriage. Marie Antoinnette writes a letter to her mother over seven years since the marriage that they finally consummated the marriage. The reason why....he was one of those guys who was not cut and when getting an erection it cause great pain
One can argue my point all day, their argument of health or better sex simply doesn't hold water.
Who is upset with my story of circumcision, those guys who have dog dicks