The nipples are the most erogenous zone in males

[g***@gmail.com]

My asshole hurts.

[p***@yahoo.co.uk]

The male nipples each contain around 3,000 to 6,000 delicate
ultra-touch-sensitive nerve endings and around 2,000 to 4,000 erotogenous
nerve endings which are interwined with the sensory touch receptors.

Wow! A nipple fetishist doing exactly what the foreskin fetishists do. He states there are X or Y thousands of special sex nerve endings. As always no scientific backup. Who counted them? Nobody knows. What are they called? Nobody knows. Just like the foreskin fetishists who come with any number from thousands to hundreds of thousands but can't give an original source!

Also sensitivity doesn't mean pleasure it can mean pain too. I know its really uncomfortable for some men to have their nipples touched. I don't like it and I tried if often enough with different girls by finger and tongue and lips.... doesn't work for me.

[m***@gmail.com]

Post by p***@yahoo.co.uk
Wow! A nipple fetishist doing exactly what the foreskin fetishists do. He states there are X or Y thousands of special sex nerve endings. As always no scientific backup. Who counted them? Nobody knows. What are they called? Nobody knows. Just like the foreskin fetishists who come with any number from thousands to hundreds of thousands but can't give an original source!

So true! Original poster rants about this "fact" and that "fact" about nipples and foreskins... but look, NEVER a source or proof:

"According to some findings..." WHIICH FINDINGS???
"According to neurological studies...." WHICH STUDIES????
"According to neurological research...." WHAT RESEARCH????
"It is proven that....." PROVEN WHEN WHERE HOW BY WHO????

Answer: NOTHING, NONE, NEVER, NOBODY.

Out of thin air he comes up with "the male nipples each contain around 3,000 to 6,000 delicate ultra-touch-sensitive nerve endings and around 2,000 to 4,000 erotogenousnerve endings" and the foreskin has "thousands and thousands of extra sensory nerve endings"

Out of thin air he dreams up three different types of sexy nerve endings...

'delicate ultra-touch sensitive nerve endings"
"erotogenous nerve endings"
"extra sensory nerve endings"

Next thing you know somebody will copy and paste it likes its gospel science!

If they had a good case they wouldn't need to invent lies to back it up would they?.

[j***@gmail.com]

Next thing you know somebody will copy and paste it likes its gospel science! 

. . . . .

Well, the post is 15 years old and since you're into facts and accuracy, you can test your hypothesis right now.

If they had a good case they wouldn't need to invent lies to back it up would they?.

No lies from the pro-infant circumision folks? You sure?

[e***@yahoo.com]

There are actual answers to those questions about determining the level of ennervation in certain parts of the skin, biophyisicists know what types of nerves deliver what sorts of sensations, and they can tell how dense or concentrated the nerves are. Such relevant modern research was recently conducted, dismissing it by ignorance is the sort of thing one would expect of a proponent for amputating healthy parts of infant bodies. And the point offered about nerves possibly also delivering pain is especially ironic coming from someone whose insisted action would by definition produce excruciating pain, with more to come lifelong as severed nerves attempt to extend into scar tissue. The pleasure would come from sexual contact, pain from torture - circumcision chooses the latter over the former.

That I had passed along the discovery that human males have a uniquely high concentration of genital nerve endings, more extreme than even males of other primates, was probably the impetus for the anti-intellectual attack on such research, since whatever average people don't comprehend they aren't inclined to believe unless they want to.

Researchers formerly mistakenly said the most sensitive part of the penis is the glans head, but we know it has nerves like the cornea of the eye, merely sensing irritation or lack thereof. The foreskin has fine-touch receptors like fingertips, and I cannot describe what that feels like there because that choice was made for me. The most sensitive part of a man's body has been proven scientifically to run across the midst of the part circumcision cuts away, the band extending from the frenulum to form the tip when retracted. I only have shreds of the frenulum remaining, which are by far the most sensitive areas of what's left - and sometimes it is where intense pain arrives spontaneously without stimulation or provocation, from the internal process involving the nerves, which would not be the case if intact.

I cannot speak to the nipple issue, it seems there is a vast difference in levels of sensitivity there among men.

[Casaman]

I must say I have never found my nipples erogenous. I have read that they might be, but after many attempts at self stimulation and several heroine efforts by my wife to arouse me thus, I gave up that enterprise many years ago. I suspect that very few men are much stimulated that way, otherwise porno would be full of examples of it! No doubt the alleged erogenous properties of the foreskin are similar, in that a few men men find the foreskin a source of sexual stimulus but most do not. This must be the case, because circumcision has been so widely practiced for so many generations all over the world, which would be inconceivable if it were really damaging the sexual properties of the penis (there is probably nothing that men value more highly!)

[e***@yahoo.com]

Absolutely absurd that you would presume to extrapolate feelings of foreskin from whatever you can sense from your nipples: if you were cut at birth you simply cannot know what the severed anatomy would have felt like or changed your life by its functions. Merely covering the glans would prevent drying out, and the buildup of less sensitive layers of skin that reduce sensitivity, so the sensations of the foreskin itself are icing on that cake.

Your sour grapes attitude does not change the fact you will never know what you're missing (so you cannot be the expert authority you want to be)- how could you imagine your penile shaft and head enrobed in your own movable skin that has nerves just like in your fingertips, only ten times more concentrated? No one has that good an imagination, you either get those sensations or not.

Only an intact male consciously experiencing the transition to being cut can legitimately speak to this issue, and I notably encountered one who was enraged at his permanent loss of pleasure (it was my noting his apparent anger that prompted the conversation).

And using the word fetish is another lie: it implies pathologically inordinate interest in a body part; there is nothing more destructive than amputation except for murder, done in this case to acquire an unnatural result the subject would be unlikely to choose for themselves by actual consent. Appreciating any part of a healthy body could be considered a fetish (like the word addiction only really means expressing desire for something), but pre-emptively hacking any part off to make what remains the desired unnatural alteration is not only a fetish but an unethical atrocity to boot.

[b***@gmail.com]

Dear mrs mudpuppy,

We can conclude that this findigs of which you were researching is an actual fact. Erection through nipple stimulation is possible.

Best regards
Anonymous 🤣