Discussion:
I'm Proud To Be Circumcised!!!!!!
(too old to reply)
Mike Burke
2009-11-25 11:05:34 UTC
Permalink
I was circumcised the day after I was born. I was born on Friday June 6,
1975 at 5:29pm (EST). On Saturday June 7, 1975 at around 2:30pm (EST) I
was circumcised.

Uncircumcised cocks are dirty and ugly. Get cut, and you will have a
clean and beautiful cock.

--
Mike Burke
Jack
2009-11-25 17:26:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike Burke
I was circumcised the day after I was born. I was born on Friday June 6,
1975 at 5:29pm (EST). On Saturday June 7, 1975 at around 2:30pm (EST) I
was circumcised.
Uncircumcised cocks are dirty and ugly. Get cut, and you will have a
clean and beautiful cock.
--
Mike Burke
When did you start to be proud?
Mike Burke
2009-11-26 02:08:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jack
When did you start to be proud?
The first time I saw an uncut guy flaccid in a porno video.

--
Mike Burke
Jack
2009-11-26 11:23:13 UTC
Permalink
I see what your conversation is all about.
David Z
2009-11-26 17:17:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jack
I see what your conversation is all about.
You only see what you want to see.
David Z
2009-11-25 23:07:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike Burke
I was circumcised the day after I was born. I was born on Friday June 6,
1975 at 5:29pm (EST). On Saturday June 7, 1975 at around 2:30pm (EST) I
was circumcised.
Uncircumcised cocks are dirty and ugly. Get cut, and you will have a
clean and beautiful cock.
--
Mike Burke
When did you start to be proud?

***************************************************

When did you start being a weasel?
Mike Burke
2009-11-26 02:14:14 UTC
Permalink
When did you start being a weasel?
I always eat turkey on Thanksgiving. Is weasel as tasty and healthy?

--
Mike Burke
David Z
2009-11-26 03:49:44 UTC
Permalink
When did you start being a weasel?
I always eat turkey on Thanksgiving. Is weasel as tasty and healthy?

**************************************************

Only if it's circumcised! <G>
Big Jim
2009-11-26 18:12:48 UTC
Permalink
I'm proud to be intact. My boy is intact too.
Post by Mike Burke
I was circumcised the day after I was born. I was born on Friday June 6,
1975 at 5:29pm (EST). On Saturday June 7, 1975 at around 2:30pm (EST) I
was circumcised.
Uncircumcised cocks are dirty and ugly. Get cut, and you will have a
clean and beautiful cock.
--
Mike Burke
windinghighway
2009-11-26 18:17:05 UTC
Permalink
I'm proud to be intact. �My boy is intact too.
Poor kid.
Big Jim
2009-11-26 21:43:15 UTC
Permalink
Better to be intact than mutilated like the savages do to their
children's genitals.
Post by windinghighway
I'm proud to be intact. My boy is intact too.
Poor kid.
windinghighway
2009-11-26 22:00:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Big Jim
Better to be intact than mutilated like the savages do to their
children's genitals.
Post by windinghighway
I'm proud to be intact. My boy is intact too.
Poor kid
windinghighway
2009-11-26 22:04:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Big Jim
Better to be intact than mutilated like the savages do to their
children's genitals.
I hope you dont pass your gross ignorance on to your boy, along with
your nasty foreskin. There are enough uncut rednecks already.
Jack
2009-11-29 21:40:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by windinghighway
Post by Big Jim
Better to be intact than mutilated like the savages do to their
children's genitals.
I hope you dont pass your gross ignorance on to your boy, along with
your nasty foreskin.   There are enough uncut rednecks already.
you're both bigots. and bigots are dumb.
Big Jim
2009-11-30 01:44:06 UTC
Permalink
No I'm intact
.
you're both bigots.  and bigots are dumb.
Jack
2009-11-30 13:54:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Big Jim
No I'm intact
.
you're both bigots.  and bigots are dumb.
Infant circumcision doesn't make parents "savages." I don't even know
what a "savage" is. I do know that the RIC debate does not need more
hyperbolic language.
ProfQ
2009-12-14 21:30:49 UTC
Permalink
Hey Big Jim, I am proud of you! While many will say the circ'd cock is
nicer to look at, is "cleaner", is less likely to cause AIDS or transmit
STDs, et.al.ad.nauseum, when proper hygiene is employed, the uncut cock
is far better for all concerned. Hygiene and proper withdrawal of the
prepuce is essential and this has to be taught to all uncut boys.
Regular, daily pulling back of the foreskin will result in a healthy and
big organ, of which any boy will be very proud. It does not increase
masturbation, nor does it stink if properly cared for.

Circumcision is a barbaric practise that has to be eradicated from this
planet. If God had intended the cock to be cut, He would have designed
it differently - DUH - go figure.
Post by Big Jim
No I'm intact
Post by Jack
.
you're both bigots. and bigots are dumb.
windinghighway
2009-12-14 23:58:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by ProfQ
While many will say the circ'd cock is
nicer to look at, is "cleaner", is less likely to cause AIDS or transmit
STDs, et.al.ad.nauseum
Nice try at skirting the obvious -- but circumcised cock IS cleaner
and IS less likely to cause AIDS or transmit STDS. Which is very
important.
Post by ProfQ
when proper hygiene is employed, the uncut cock
is far better for all concerned.
And when it isnt, as is usually the case for the great mass of
mankind?
Post by ProfQ
Hygiene and proper withdrawal of the
prepuce is essential and this has to be taught to all uncut boys.
You make the elementary mistake of assuming that if you want something
taught, then (a) it will be taught (b) it will be learned and (c) it
will be applied in practice. If that were true, we could teach away
cigarette smoking, driving at excessive speed, and tooth decay.
Post by ProfQ
If God had intended the cock to be cut, He would have designed
it differently - DUH - go figure.
This may be news to you, but god didnt design the cock. Evolution
designed the cock. It designed the foreskin to protect the sensitive
glans of a naked creature living on a savannah of sharp grasses, spiky
thorns, biting insects, and no AIDS. Since then our cultural
evolution has far outpaced biological evolution. We wear clothes, so
we dont need that protection, and we enjoy oral sex, so we dont want
an organ designed to reek of stale piss and cheesy smegma.
Jack
2009-12-15 22:56:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by windinghighway
Post by ProfQ
While many will say the circ'd cock is
nicer to look at, is "cleaner", is less likely to cause AIDS or transmit
STDs, et.al.ad.nauseum
Nice try at skirting the obvious -- but circumcised cock IS cleaner
and  IS less likely to cause AIDS or transmit STDS.  Which is very
important.
Post by ProfQ
when proper hygiene is employed, the uncut cock
is far better for all concerned.
And when it isnt, as is usually the case for the great mass of
mankind?
Post by ProfQ
Hygiene and proper withdrawal of the
prepuce is essential and this has to be taught to all uncut boys.
You make the elementary mistake of assuming that if you want something
taught, then (a) it will be taught (b) it will be learned and (c) it
will be applied in practice.   If that were true, we could teach away
cigarette smoking, driving at excessive speed, and tooth decay.
Post by ProfQ
If God had intended the cock to be cut, He would have designed
it differently - DUH - go figure.
This may be news to you, but god didnt design the cock.   Evolution
designed the cock.   It designed the foreskin to protect the sensitive
glans of a naked creature living on a savannah of sharp grasses, spiky
thorns, biting insects, and no AIDS.  Since then our cultural
evolution has far outpaced biological evolution.   We wear clothes, so
we dont need that protection, and we enjoy oral sex, so we dont want
an organ designed to reek of stale piss and cheesy smegma.
Can you point to any resources to back up your concept that the
foreskin has no function in modern society--pretty hard to prove that
something doesn't exist, isn't it?
ProfQ
2009-12-18 18:00:06 UTC
Permalink
On 2009/12/16 00:56, Jack wrote:
[snip, as in circ]
Post by Jack
Post by windinghighway
This may be news to you, but god didnt design the cock. Evolution
designed the cock. It designed the foreskin to protect the sensitive
glans of a naked creature living on a savannah of sharp grasses, spiky
thorns, biting insects, and no AIDS. Since then our cultural
evolution has far outpaced biological evolution. We wear clothes, so
we dont need that protection, and we enjoy oral sex, so we dont want
an organ designed to reek of stale piss and cheesy smegma.
What is your nose doing so close to the cock. That's why they are at
opposite ends of the body, idiot!
Post by Jack
Can you point to any resources to back up your concept that the
foreskin has no function in modern society--pretty hard to prove that
something doesn't exist, isn't it?
Well said, Jack. But "evolutionists" will prove everything that doesn't
exist, and disprove everything that does exist. I wonder why they stop
short of explaining how gravity has not evolved from something else?

Guess they will justify climate change as being the imperative demise of
the planet. The result of over population. The result of over
circumcision. The result of too much fucking going on. ad nauseam!
ProfQ
2009-12-18 17:55:49 UTC
Permalink
EVOLUTION, what utter crap! If you are of the opinion, windinghighway,
that God did not create this planet and everything in it, then there is
no use discussing anything with you. None so blind as those who choose
not to see.
Post by windinghighway
Post by ProfQ
While many will say the circ'd cock is
nicer to look at, is "cleaner", is less likely to cause AIDS or transmit
STDs, et.al.ad.nauseum
Nice try at skirting the obvious -- but circumcised cock IS cleaner
and IS less likely to cause AIDS or transmit STDS. Which is very
important.
Post by ProfQ
when proper hygiene is employed, the uncut cock
is far better for all concerned.
And when it isnt, as is usually the case for the great mass of
mankind?
Post by ProfQ
Hygiene and proper withdrawal of the
prepuce is essential and this has to be taught to all uncut boys.
You make the elementary mistake of assuming that if you want something
taught, then (a) it will be taught (b) it will be learned and (c) it
will be applied in practice. If that were true, we could teach away
cigarette smoking, driving at excessive speed, and tooth decay.
Post by ProfQ
If God had intended the cock to be cut, He would have designed
it differently - DUH - go figure.
This may be news to you, but god didnt design the cock. Evolution
designed the cock. It designed the foreskin to protect the sensitive
glans of a naked creature living on a savannah of sharp grasses, spiky
thorns, biting insects, and no AIDS. Since then our cultural
evolution has far outpaced biological evolution. We wear clothes, so
we dont need that protection, and we enjoy oral sex, so we dont want
an organ designed to reek of stale piss and cheesy smegma.
Jake Waskett
2009-12-18 20:39:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by ProfQ
EVOLUTION, what utter crap! If you are of the opinion, windinghighway,
that God did not create this planet and everything in it, then there is
no use discussing anything with you. None so blind as those who choose
not to see.
Oh dear...
windinghighway
2009-12-21 12:23:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jake Waskett
Post by ProfQ
EVOLUTION, what utter crap! If you are of the opinion, windinghighway,
that God did not create this planet and everything in it, then there is
no use discussing anything with you. None so blind as those who choose
not to see.
Oh dear...
Yup. I have often commented on how the anti-circ position attracts
every kind of crackpot imagineable -- holocaust deniers, AIDS
deniers, purveyors of death threats, scientific illiterates,
conspiracy theorists, homosexual smegmaphiles, and so on.. It comes
as no surprise that we can now add a biblical creationist to the list!
ProfQ
2009-12-26 11:13:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by windinghighway
Post by Jake Waskett
Post by ProfQ
EVOLUTION, what utter crap! If you are of the opinion, windinghighway,
that God did not create this planet and everything in it, then there is
no use discussing anything with you. None so blind as those who choose
not to see.
Oh dear...
Yup. I have often commented on how the anti-circ position attracts
every kind of crackpot imagineable -- holocaust deniers, AIDS
deniers, purveyors of death threats, scientific illiterates,
conspiracy theorists, homosexual smegmaphiles, and so on.. It comes
as no surprise that we can now add a biblical creationist to the list!
Now there's an interesting concept: "homosexual smegaphiles" wow!
Amazing imagery!
windinghighway
2009-12-26 17:10:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by ProfQ
Yup. � I have often commented on how the anti-circ position attracts
every kind of crackpot imagineable -- �holocaust deniers, �AIDS
deniers, purveyors of death threats, scientific illiterates,
conspiracy theorists, homosexual smegmaphiles, and so on.. � It comes
as no surprise that we can now add a biblical creationist to the list!
Now there's an interesting concept: "homosexual smegaphiles" wow!
Amazing imagery!- Hide quoted text -
Glad you like the imagery -- but that's only the written word. If
you want to see the real thing, here are a couple of websites you can
check. You would love these guys -- they are always campaigning
against circumcision.

http://dickcheese.net/
http://www.homoerection.com/smegma04/index.html

Enjoy!
ProfQ
2010-01-04 19:53:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by windinghighway
Post by ProfQ
Yup. � I have often commented on how the anti-circ position attracts
every kind of crackpot imagineable -- �holocaust deniers, �AIDS
deniers, purveyors of death threats, scientific illiterates,
conspiracy theorists, homosexual smegmaphiles, and so on.. � It comes
as no surprise that we can now add a biblical creationist to the list!
Now there's an interesting concept: "homosexual smegaphiles" wow!
Amazing imagery!- Hide quoted text -
Glad you like the imagery -- but that's only the written word. If
you want to see the real thing, here are a couple of websites you can
check. You would love these guys -- they are always campaigning
against circumcision.
http://dickcheese.net/
http://www.homoerection.com/smegma04/index.html
Enjoy!
Okay, point made, those dicks are damn ugly with all that smelly crap
all over them, but my point is that hygiene is the only answer to
smegma. It washes clean away. Unless there are definite reasons to
circumcise, don't! It's the way it was designed, and humans have not
evolved to any extent that they are born without it.
Andrew Usher
2010-01-05 01:19:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by ProfQ
Okay, point made, those dicks are damn ugly with all that smelly crap
all over them, but my point is that hygiene is the only answer to
smegma.
You have to know that circumcision is at least as good (actually
better).
Post by ProfQ
It washes clean away. Unless there are definite reasons to
circumcise, don't! It's the way it was designed, and humans have not
evolved to any extent that they are born without it.
Actually, circumcision proponents have addressed the evolutionary
issue and I haven't seen any rebuttal of it.

Andrew Usher
Jack
2010-01-05 17:11:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andrew Usher
Post by ProfQ
Okay, point made, those dicks are damn ugly with all that smelly crap
all over them, but my point is that hygiene is the only answer to
smegma.
You have to know that circumcision is at least as good (actually
better).
Post by ProfQ
It washes clean away. Unless there are definite reasons to
circumcise, don't! It's the way it was designed, and humans have not
evolved to any extent that they are born without it.
Actually, circumcision proponents have addressed the evolutionary
issue and I haven't seen any rebuttal of it.
Andrew Usher
ProfQ
2010-01-07 17:22:56 UTC
Permalink
You never change, do you, Andrew?
Post by Andrew Usher
Post by ProfQ
Okay, point made, those dicks are damn ugly with all that smelly crap
all over them, but my point is that hygiene is the only answer to
smegma.
You have to know that circumcision is at least as good (actually
better).
Post by ProfQ
It washes clean away. Unless there are definite reasons to
circumcise, don't! It's the way it was designed, and humans have not
evolved to any extent that they are born without it.
Actually, circumcision proponents have addressed the evolutionary
issue and I haven't seen any rebuttal of it.
Andrew Usher
Andrew Usher
2010-01-08 03:04:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by ProfQ
You never change, do you, Andrew?
I still don't see a rebuttal, idiot.

Andrew Usher
j***@gmail.com
2014-06-13 18:17:27 UTC
Permalink
My cock is big, beautiful, and clean, TYVM.

Wilful ignorance is sad. :(
j***@gmail.com
2014-06-16 13:44:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@gmail.com
My cock is big, beautiful, and clean, TYVM.
Wilful ignorance is sad :(
It is interesting that you care. Why do you think that is? Just another empathetic guy telling the world he has a big dick on the internet?
S
2014-06-19 10:36:44 UTC
Permalink
Jack,

If you're against circ, why're you challenging those who're rebutting the circ proponents?
j***@gmail.com
2014-06-19 22:12:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by S
Jack,
If you're against circ, why're you challenging those who're rebutting the circ proponents?
good question. i was confused.
S
2014-06-20 06:07:04 UTC
Permalink
Confused about what?
p***@yahoo.co.uk
2014-06-23 22:55:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by S
Confused about what?
S, he's confused about everything because he's an alcoholic who posts here when he's drunk. He admits he's a drunk and pothead and he's on a slew of other prescription meds too. That's why he contradicts himself and forgets what he posted and denies his posts and can't keep up a straight argument. When you are drunk every stupid thing you post looks good to you. I know these self centered arseholes only too well from working behind a bar for years.
j***@gmail.com
2014-06-24 01:19:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by p***@yahoo.co.uk
Post by S
Confused about what?
S, he's confused about everything because he's an alcoholic who posts here when he's drunk. He admits he's a drunk and pothead and he's on a slew of other prescription meds too. That's why he contradicts himself and forgets what he posted and denies his posts and can't keep up a straight argument. When you are drunk every stupid thing you post looks good to you. I know these self centered arseholes only too well from working behind a bar for years.
Let it out, Parker. Vent your demons. Your "rakush" as S might term it. Release the tik-tiki that haunt your brain.
p***@yahoo.co.uk
2014-07-07 21:15:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@gmail.com
Post by p***@yahoo.co.uk
Post by S
Confused about what?
S, he's confused about everything because he's an alcoholic who posts here when he's drunk. He admits he's a drunk and pothead and he's on a slew of other prescription meds too. That's why he contradicts himself and forgets what he posted and denies his posts and can't keep up a straight argument. When you are drunk every stupid thing you post looks good to you. I know these self centered arseholes only too well from working behind a bar for years.
Let it out, Parker. Vent your demons. Your "rakush" as S might term it. Release the tik-tiki that haunt your brain.
Nice try Jack... absolutely classic alcoholic response when somebody points out problems caused by drinking. Try to change the subject and make it an issue about the person who points out the problem instead. It's pathetic how predictable you are.

Why not face the facts about YOU instead? Are any of these wrong?
-- your're a drunk
-- your're a pothead
-- you're on prescription drugs
-- you contradict yourself and forget what you posted
-- you even deny you posted stuff that you did
---you get "confused" and attack posters who agree with you by mistake.

That's why you've been posting the same rubbish here for years. Try posting SOBER sometime. Maybe people here will take you seriously and we can have a proper discussion.
Quentin
2014-07-08 04:38:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by p***@yahoo.co.uk
Post by j***@gmail.com
Post by p***@yahoo.co.uk
Post by S
Confused about what?
S, he's confused about everything because he's an alcoholic who posts here when he's drunk. He admits he's a drunk and pothead and he's on a slew of other prescription meds too. That's why he contradicts himself and forgets what he posted and denies his posts and can't keep up a straight argument. When you are drunk every stupid thing you post looks good to you. I know these self centered arseholes only too well from working behind a bar for years.
Let it out, Parker. Vent your demons. Your "rakush" as S might term it. Release the tik-tiki that haunt your brain.
Nice try Jack... absolutely classic alcoholic response when somebody points out problems caused by drinking. Try to change the subject and make it an issue about the person who points out the problem instead. It's pathetic how predictable you are.
Why not face the facts about YOU instead? Are any of these wrong?
-- your're a drunk
-- your're a pothead
-- you're on prescription drugs
-- you contradict yourself and forget what you posted
-- you even deny you posted stuff that you did
---you get "confused" and attack posters who agree with you by mistake.
That's why you've been posting the same rubbish here for years. Try posting SOBER sometime. Maybe people here will take you seriously and we can have a proper discussion.
Park, I have seen many of Jack's posts now and he is clearly an internet "troll" who wants to draw attention to himself no matter how rude or irrelevant his comments are. Such people usually have personality issues in real life (they are often social isolates, shy, insecure et cetera) but online they can assume the opposite roles. The object is to be noticed, nothing more. By repeatedly challenging him you are just encouraging him to continue the behaviour. Frankly it would be better just to ignore him.
Claude D
2015-10-05 07:47:25 UTC
Permalink
I am proud also! I am french which normally lacks circumcision so this happened how? Here is the reason. My grandfather was circumcised algerien who married french, then his son was circumcised, who is my father, then I was circumcised also. A gift from the generations!! This makes me proud because?

Each occasion I make love a girl says she likes it so much and how it is preferred to uncircumcised. Some girls discovered circumcision for the first time with me and they taste and suck with supreme pleasure! My sons not born will receive the same gift!! They will be proud also.
Claude D
2015-10-07 14:44:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by j***@gmail.com
My cock is big, beautiful, and clean, TYVM.
Felicitations! Your <cock> is beautiful and clean then you are circumcised.

I hope it is big also but every man says that --

anonymous
2009-12-11 10:28:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike Burke
I was circumcised the day after I was born. I was born on Friday June 6,
1975 at 5:29pm (EST). On Saturday June 7, 1975 at around 2:30pm (EST) I
was circumcised.
Uncircumcised cocks are dirty and ugly. Get cut, and you will have a
clean and beautiful cock.
--
Mike Burke
Unfortunately, your priorities are wrong. It isn't how cut or uncut a
penis is or even necessarily long or short the penis is. And beauty is
in the eyes of the beholder which is why most women think a penis is
ugly. What any man or young man will tell you is important is that it
works. The world is full of cirucmcised penis and uncircumcised penis
which work just fine. It is those penises that are uncircumcised and
circumcised that don't work that cause a man a lot of heartache and
sadness.
G. Curry
2010-01-03 18:40:12 UTC
Permalink
--
.
Post by Mike Burke
I was circumcised the day after I was born. I was born on Friday June 6,
1975 at 5:29pm (EST). On Saturday June 7, 1975 at around 2:30pm (EST) I
was circumcised.
Uncircumcised cocks are dirty and ugly. Get cut, and you will have a
clean and beautiful cock.
--
Mike Burke
What a load of rot.

G.Curry>
David Z
2010-01-03 18:49:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by G. Curry
--
.
Post by Mike Burke
I was circumcised the day after I was born. I was born on Friday June 6,
1975 at 5:29pm (EST). On Saturday June 7, 1975 at around 2:30pm (EST) I
was circumcised.
Uncircumcised cocks are dirty and ugly. Get cut, and you will have a
clean and beautiful cock.
--
Mike Burke
What a load of rot.
G.Curry>
That's the first thing you've said in this newsgroup that's correct. And
that load of rot is hanging off the end of your dick.
Loading...