Post by ProfQWhile many will say the circ'd cock is
nicer to look at, is "cleaner", is less likely to cause AIDS or transmit
STDs, et.al.ad.nauseum
Nice try at skirting the obvious -- but circumcised cock IS cleaner
and IS less likely to cause AIDS or transmit STDS. Which is very
important.
Post by ProfQwhen proper hygiene is employed, the uncut cock
is far better for all concerned.
And when it isnt, as is usually the case for the great mass of
mankind?
Post by ProfQHygiene and proper withdrawal of the
prepuce is essential and this has to be taught to all uncut boys.
You make the elementary mistake of assuming that if you want something
taught, then (a) it will be taught (b) it will be learned and (c) it
will be applied in practice. If that were true, we could teach away
cigarette smoking, driving at excessive speed, and tooth decay.
Post by ProfQIf God had intended the cock to be cut, He would have designed
it differently - DUH - go figure.
This may be news to you, but god didnt design the cock. Evolution
designed the cock. It designed the foreskin to protect the sensitive
glans of a naked creature living on a savannah of sharp grasses, spiky
thorns, biting insects, and no AIDS. Since then our cultural
evolution has far outpaced biological evolution. We wear clothes, so
we dont need that protection, and we enjoy oral sex, so we dont want
an organ designed to reek of stale piss and cheesy smegma.